Epstein Secrets

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 38 A. Yes. Q. Was that the truth? A. No. Q. In fact, you went to Royal Palm, right? A. Yes. Q. So you lied to Mr. Epstein again, correct? A. Yes. Q. Is Wellington the college that you told Jeff's assistant that you w

fically "to protect defendants." Legg v. Wyeth, 428 F.3d 1317, 1325 (11th Cir. 2005). Cf., e.g., Picquet v. Amoco Prod. Co., 513 F. Supp. 938, 941 (M.D. La. 1981) (explaining that courts developed the fraudulent-joinder doctrine to protect "the right [of removal] granted to 8 In Bonner v. City of Prichard,

f 100 41 nsor & Associates Repanang and Transcdpdan, lac Page 38 1 A. Yes. 2 Q. Was that the truth? 3 A. No. 4 Q. In fact, you went to Royal Palm, right? 5 A. Yes. 6 Q. So you lied to Mr. Epstein again, correct? 7 A. Yes. 8 Q. Is Wellington the college that you told 9 Jeff's assis

fically "to protect defendants." Legg v. Wyeth, 428 F.3d 1317, 1325 (11th Cir. 2005). Cf., e.g., Picquet v. Amoco Prod. Co., 513 F. Supp. 938, 941 (M.D. La. 1981) (explaining that courts developed the fraudulent-joinder doctrine to protect "the right [of removal] granted to 8 In Bonner v. City of Prichard,

100 ior nsor & Associates kg:Toning add Tansciirinn, Inc Page 38 1 A. Yes. 2 Q. Was that the truth? 3 A. No. 4 Q. In fact, you went to Royal Palm, right? 5 A. Yes. 6 Q. So you lied to Mr. Epstein again, correct? 7 A. Yes. 8 Q. Is Wellington the college that you told 9 Jeff's assis

fically "to protect defendants." Legg v. Wyeth, 428 F.3d 1317, 1325 (11th Cir. 2005). Cf., e.g., Picquet v. Amoco Prod. Co., 513 F. Supp. 938, 941 (M.D. La. 1981) (explaining that courts developed the fraudulent-joinder doctrine to protect "the right [of removal] granted to In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661