Epstein Secrets

ommunications of Edwards as an administrative convenience to him in developing a privilege log, but would not maintain any copies: Mlle law firm of Fowler White Burnett, ■., will print a hard copy of all of the documents contained on the discs with Bates numbers added, and will provide a set of copied, stamped docu

2018 5:01 PM, Clerk, Fourth District Court of Appeal Petitioner, -VS- SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., E.W., and JANE DOE, Intervenors. Respondents / JOINDER BY VICTIMS IN EDWARDS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL RELIEF FROM STAY WITH REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED CONSIDE

NFIDENTIALITY ORDER THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the agreement of (1) Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), (2) Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), (3) Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White") and its insurer, (4) Intervenors Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. (collectively, "Intervenors"), and (5) Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edward

s ("Edwards"), (2) Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), (3) Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White") and its insurer, (4) Intervenors Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. (collectively, "Intervenors"), and (5) Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos and Lehrman ("Farmer Jaffe") (collectively, the "Mediation Participants

ards Niall T. McLachlan Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A. 100 S.E. Second Street, Suite 4200 Miami, FL 33131 [email protected] Counsel for Fowler White Burnett, P.A. EFTA00808136 Case 09-34791-R BR Doc 6384 Filed 05/14/18 Page 6 of 6 Isaac M. Marcushamer Berger Singerman LLPO 1450 Brickell Avenue, S

ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., CHAPTER 11 Debtor. INTERVENORS L.M., E.W.. AND JANE DOE'S LIST OF REOUESTED RELIEF SOUGHT IN THIS CASE Intervenors L.M., E.W., and "Jane Doe" (hereinafter "the Victims"), proceeding pseudonymously, having previously been allowed to intervene in this action, and having part

ng him not to answer if it's based on our communications period. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q The second paragraph of this affidavit says, "The law firm of Fowler White Burnett, PA, represented me" -- meaning you -- "in the state court proceeding from June 2010 through May 2012." What were the terms on which you retained

J. Quinney College of Law at the Utah University of Doe Peter E. Shapiro Shapiro Law uite 3000 ounse or ., . . an ane Doe Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Niall T. McLachlan Carlton Fields Jorden Burt P.A. 200 °rinse or ow er nr e urnett, P.A. Isaac M. Marcushamer Ber er Sin erman LLP C

Edwards, Fixtos & Lehrman, P.L. ("Farmer Jaffe") filed the Motion for Order to Show Cause [D.E. 6326] alleging that the attorneys at the law firm of Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White") violated this Court's Agreed Order Cancelling Hearing on Motion for Relief front Amended Order [D.E. 10681 and to Compel Jef

6355], and the Reply [D.E. 6358] thereto. Interested Party Bradley Edwards filed a notice of joinder [D.E. 6325], and sexual assault victims, L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, filed a Motion to Intervene [D.E. 6344] and a Motion for Joinder [D.E. 6345], which were granted at the April 13th Hearing. [D.E. 636

AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT, TO PERMIT DISCOVERY, TO ASSESS SANCTIONS AND COSTS, AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White"), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby responds to Farmer Jaffe's Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why Fowl

e any detail—much less an unequivocal command—as to what Fowler White is to do with the disc at issue. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Although L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe have sought to join in the motion for order to show cause, they have not been granted leave to intervene in this action. The motion to

e Doe Niall T. McLachlan Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A. Isaac M. Marcushamer Berger Singerman LLP Counsel for Liquidating Trustee Counsel for Fowler White Burnett, P.A. 2077028 8 EFTA00794245

nse or armer a e, eissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of h Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Peter E. Shapiro Sha.iro Law Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Niall T. McLachlan Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A. Isaac M. Marc

e Doe Peter E. Shapiro Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Niall T. McLachlan Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A. Isaac M. Marcushamer Counsel for Fowler White Burnett, P.A. Counsel for Liquidating Trustee 13 EFTA00794268

or armer affe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Peter E. Shapiro Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Niall T. McLachlan Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A. Isaac M. Marcushamer Coun

NFIDENTIALITY ORDER THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the agreement of (1) Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), (2) Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), (3) Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White") and its insurer, (4) Intervenors Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. (collectively, "Intervenors"), and (5) Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edward

s ("Edwards"), (2) Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), (3) Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White") and its insurer, (4) Intervenors Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. (collectively, "Intervenors"), and (5) Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos and Lehrman ("Farmer Jaffe") (collectively, the "Mediation Participants

amping these thousands of documents [DE 1120], ultimately resulting in an order from this Court that Epstein's counsel— attorneys at the law firm of Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White")—would make a copy of the materials and return them to Fanner Jaffe. Because of Fanner Jaffe's obvious concern that 1 EFTA00

to have dealt with this issue head on because of the apparent implications of same." Hearing Trans. at 60:20-61:14. 33. Counsel for victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe also asked Judge Hafele to order Fowler White to explain who they had distributed the confidential materials to. Judge Hafele indicat