Epstein Secrets

AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT, TO PERMIT DISCOVERY, TO ASSESS SANCTIONS AND COSTS, AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White"), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby responds to Farmer Jaffe's Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why Fowl

uous order must be made before the burden shifts to the alleged contemnor to produce evidence explaining his noncompliance at a show cause hearing. Burgess, 143 F.3d at 1436. "Clear and convincing evidence entails proof that a claim is 'highly probable,' a standard requiring more than a preponderance o

amping these thousands of documents [DE 1120], ultimately resulting in an order from this Court that Epstein's counsel— attorneys at the law firm of Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White")—would make a copy of the materials and return them to Fanner Jaffe. Because of Fanner Jaffe's obvious concern that 1 EFTA00

"[a] petitioner `must [first] establish by clear and convincing evidence that the alleged contemnor violated [a] court's earlier order." Chairs v. Burgess, 143 F.3d 1432. 1436 (11th Cir. 1998) (quoting United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698. 700 (1 I th Cir. 1988)). Once such a prima facie showing of c

t of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida t ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNIIVISTATESATIORNEY VIA FACSIMILE Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Fowler White Burnett 1395 Brickell Ave Fl 14 Miami Florida 33131-3300 Re: Jeffrey Epstein 99 ME. Slheti Miens& FL 33132 August 3, 2007 Dear Lilly: Thank you for

Cir. 190.9); United States I Panful, supra, 338 F.3d 1299 (11th Cir. 20 3); United States 1 Garrett, 190 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 1999); United States! Burgess, 175 F.3d 1261 (11th Cir. 1949); United States Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 05); United States I Root, 296 F.3d 1222 (11'h Cir. 200 ). Uni