Epstein Secrets

aintiff Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Edwards Pottinger LW 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 [email protected] Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 [email protected] [email protected] Couns

Tort Claimants and possibly others. Epstein denies this motivation EFTA00805158 and maintains his probable cause was grounded in media reports of the Rothstein Ponzi scheme and the realization of the possible connection for Edwards' litigation behavior unrelated to the claims of his three clients. Court's Rulin

tiff Bradley J. Edwards 13 EFTA00808468 Bradley J. Edwards Edwards Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter- Plaintiff-Bradley J. E

aim against both Rothstein and Edwards) in connection with the use of Epstein case materials, which were improperly utilized to lure investors into the Rothstein Ponzi scheme is clearly and irrefutably related to Edwards' counterclaim against Epstein for filing that original claim. Yet, to mislead this Court into

r to the proceeding. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was emailed and ft-- mailed this of clay of February, 2011 to Marc S. Nurik, Esq., One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; and Jack Scarola, Esquire, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 36

in a case like this where incentives offered to Edwards and accepted by Edwards are plainly relevant to a determination of whether he was privy to the Rothstein Ponzi scheme and why he decided even to join RRA. It is significantly relevant to his counterclaim since he is claiming loss of profits and injury to his