Epstein Secrets

ded the cost of dealing with over 70,000 emails — a cost that could not be advanced by Rothstein's bankrupt firm, Edwards' attorney Jack Scarola of Searcy Denney told Law360 on Monday. "The strong language in the order was considered adequate protection to preserve the confidentiality of the documents," Scar

stein never even knew Fowler White had the disc until we found it." Counsel for three victims — identified as L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe — asked Judge Hafele to order Fowler White to explain its handling of the confidential documents, but he said he lacked the authority to do so since the firm had withdr

d the materials from Fowler White's files. According to the motion, during a March 8 hearing on the privileged communications, State Circuit Judge Donald W. Hafele said, "The critical question, though, is why did Fowler White have these documents, why were they continued to be held, and was it in violation eith

M. or E.W. cases. 22. All documents that support your claim of damages In your counterclaim in this case. 23. The written fee agreement with the Searcy Denney firm for their representation of you in this case. 24. All emalls exchanged between you (or anyone of your behalf) and one or more of the followi

eissing, Edwards, Flstos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Attorneys for Defendant, LM. Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. est Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A

e time you were employed by RRA (or that is being claimed by the Trustee). 20. In the attached transcript dated July 31, 2009, you stated to Judge Hafele with regard to the E.W. and L.M. cases the following: 5 EFTA00606616 "What the evidence is really going to show Is that Mr. Epstein — at least

regoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 11th day of February , 2009: Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Bamhart & Jack Alan Goldberger Phone Phone Fax Fax Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Counsel for Plaintiff P.A. EFTA0072270

0 minutes Hearing on Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss, for More Definite Statement, and to Strike Directed to Plaintiffs Complaint Dear Judge Hafele: Enclosed please find a copy of the case law and Florida Statutes cited in Defendant Epstein' otion to Dismiss, For More Definite Statement, and to

M. or E.W. cases. 22. All documents that support your claim of damages In your counterclaim in this case. 23. The written fee agreement with the Searcy Denney firm for their representation of you In this case. 24. All emails exchanged between you (or anyone of your behalf) and one or more of the followi

e time you were employed by RRA (or that is being claimed by the Trustee). 20. In the attached transcript dated July 31, 2009, you stated to Judge Hafele with regard to the E.W. and L.M. cases the following: 5 EFTA00724400 "What the evidence is really going to show is that Mr. Epstein — at least