Epstein Secrets

aponry is a military and political imperative. An electromagnetic shield could potentially halt incoming projectiles launched from Gaza, Tehran, or North Korea. A swarm of insect-size nano- drones could compensate for lack of familiarity with terrain and difficulties in attracting recruits for Israel's com

g or mothballing a strategically significant portion of its nuclear infrastructure. Mr. Kissinger is a former U.S. secretary ofstate (1973-77); Mr. Shultz is a former U.S. secretary of state (1982-89). The Daily Beast Memo to Bibi Netanyahu: It's Time to Build an Arsenal of Awe Lloyd Green Decembe

tober 28, 2025. Location: Online event, 2:00 PM. Join the CSIS Korea Chair for a discussion unpacking the growing ties among China, Russia, Iran and North Korea, which some have called a CRINK axis or an "Axis of Upheaval." • AEI: Election Watch 2026: One Year (and One Week) Out — Tuesday, October 28, 2025

g was provided by Tampa Bay Times (10/27, Sullivan, Marrero), Bay News 9 (10/27, Cole, Lewis), WFLA (NBC-8) (10/27, Suter), Tampa Free Press (10/27, Shultz), and Hoodline Tampa (10/27, Rodriguez). Continued Reporting: NBA at the Mercy of FBI in Gambling Scandal News Nation Now (10/27, Taub) reported t

noodles, meat and kimchi; no fruit or salad’’) and accommodations (“a worn, drab-colored suite consisting of a bedroom and a salon’’) in places like North Korea. Nor will his fellow Egyptians be much intrigued by the details of his battles against nuclear proliferators. At the moment, the protestors have othe

d political concerns. At times, his narrative comes close to condoning the motives of states that seek nuclear weapons. “Iran’s goal is not to become another North Korea — a nuclear weapons possessor but a pariah in the international community — but rather Brazil or Japan, a technological powerhouse with the capacity

ry of state, George Shultz, a canny pragmatist who made significant progress in several areas without being associated with a single momentous event. Shultz was known for valuing the “career people” (foreign- service officers) and casting a wide net for advice. Hillary does that, too, though she’s still s

should they fall into unauthorized hands—is overly rigid and shortsighted. It is too bad that the authors of the statement didn’t make this point.) Shultz, Kissinger, et al. correctly urge that international measures be taken to place control of the nuclear fuel cycle in safe hands. But accomplishing th

and have the potential to go on doing so. The opprobrium attached to ignoring or dismissing the goal of global zero has no influence on the Irans and North Koreas, but it does have an influence on us. It makes it easy, for example, for reflexively anti-nuclear voices in the Congress and the Obama administration