Epstein Secrets

Attachments: 2021.11.14 Mm forOrderAuthaSubPursm_to_F.R.Crim.P_17(c) 2021.11.14_Ex._1.pdf Inline-Images: image001.gif; image002.jpg Thanks, Jeff. Brian, in light of Jeff's email, attached is the unredacted defense motion. i ns hanks From: Jeff Pagliuca Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 9:07 PM T

From: '• To: Jeff Pagliuca Cc: "ceverdel C (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Subpoena for Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 02:27:03 +0000 Attachments: 2021.11.14 Mm forOrderAuthaSubPursm_to_F

der, and the motion contains information designated as confidential. Accordingly, we will defer to it as to what you should receive. Best Regards, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca. On Nov 17, 2021, at 7:58 PM, Brian Burns wrote: Defense counsel — Would you please provide us a copy of your motion seeking the issuance of this

From: '• To: Jeff Pagliuca Cc: "ceverdel C (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Subpoe

uca November 17, 2021 9:27 PM Brian Burns (USANYS) Subject: (EXTERNAL EMAIL] RE: Subpoena for Jordana Feldman >; Laura Menninger Thanks, Jeff. Brian, in light of Jeff's email, attached is the unredacted defense motion. Thanks. From: Jeff Pagliuca Sent: Wednesda November 17 2021 9:07 PM To: Bri

: [EXTERNAL] RE: Subpoena fo Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 19:44:11 +0000 Attachments: 2021.11.15_-_ 1 - Letter from Patrick J. Smith to Judge_Nathan.pdf Jeff Pagliuca Inline-Images: image001.gif; image002.jpg Counsel - We are required to file our Nov. 15 letter to Judge Nathan on the public docket by tomorrow (co

der, and the motion contains information designated as confidential. Accordingly, we will defer to it as to what you should receive. Best Regards, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca. On Nov 17, 2021, at 7:58 PM, Brian Burns wrote: Defense counsel — Would you please provide us a copy of your motion seeking the issuance of this

r from Patrick J. Smith to Judge_Nathan.pdf Jeff Pagliuca Inline-Images: image001.gif; image002.jpg Couns

Sigve Brekke Ian Bremmer Berge Brende Marcus Brennecke Maurice Brenninkmeirer Erik A. Brenninkmeijer Jim Breyer Samir Brikho Sergey Briley Sergey Brin William A. Brindley Hannes Britschgi Romero Britto Jeffrey D. Brody Beth A. Brooke Stuart Brooks David Brooks Rebekah Brooks Richard D. Broo

Jim Breyer Samir Brikho Sergey Briley Sergey Brin William A. Brindley Hannes Britschgi Romero Br

aasschen Gregory R. Page Reed Paget Stephen G. Pagliuca Dinesh C. Paliwal Mark Palmer Marco Panara Vi

E_OVERSIGHT_014179 9 818 100 ( S485 Obe ate 100 BRIN BALYS ¥e}) 9988 By OLE 100 i ZOP. b6z G19 100 E

ment is being served to all parties of record via transmission of the Electronic Court Filing System generated by CM/ECF. Laura A. Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Sigrid S. ne HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014121 EXHIBIT 1 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_0

ted by CM/ECF. Laura A. Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10

te: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:42:56 +0000 Attachments: 20cr330_Order_re_Protective_Order 11.24.21.pdf; 20cr330_Subpoena_Protective_Order_11.24.21.pdf Hi Brian and Patrick, What is the most efficient way for us to receive a copy of the materials? Would you be able to upload them to our file sharing platfor

New York, NY 10007 From: Nathan NYSD Chambers c Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 2:36 PM To: Brian Bums a; Patrick Smith a; sc ='; (USANYS) Jeff Pagliuca c ; Laura Menninger Subject: 20cr330, US v. Maxwell Counsel: Attached please find two Orders issued by Judge Nathan, which will be docketed short

stions that were posed to 15 these witnesses were precisely the kind of questions that have 16 been disapproved in the Second Circuit. And that's Brink's 17 Inc. v. City of New York, which is in the papers; WorldCom 18 Security Litigation, also in the papers; and LiButti itself. 19 These are no

ly, your Honor, I think you can 10 just see from the upset there what's going to be happening at 11 this trial. This is the direct quote from Mr. Pagliuca. 12 "Fantastical conspiracy". That's going to be the argument from 13 the other side. They're obviously entitled to advance that 14 argument. B

stions that were posed to 15 these witnesses were precisely the kind of questions that have 16 been disapproved in the Second Circuit. And that's Brink's 17 Inc. v. City of New York, which is in the papers; WorldCom 18 Security Litigation, also in the papers; and LiButti itself. 19 These are no

ly, your Honor, I think you can 10 just see from the upset there what's going to be happening at 11 this trial. This is the direct quote from Mr. Pagliuca. 12 "Fantastical conspiracy". That's going to be the argument from 13 the other side. They're obviously entitled to advance that 14 argument. B

d of questions that were posed to these witnesses were precisely the kind of questions that have been disapproved in the Second Circuit. And that's Brink's Inc. v. City of New York, which is in the papers; WorldCom Security Litigation, also in the papers; and LiButti itself. These are not technical

: In reply, your Honor, I think you can just see from the upset there what's going to be happening at this trial. This is the direct quote from Mr. Pagliuca. "Fantastical conspiracy". That's going to be the argument from the other side. They're obviously entitled to advance that argument. But that's wh