Epstein Secrets

omic Substance Theory. WHY do sophisticated investors like the ones I have detailed extensively bother "investing" in these sham companies?? Take Mr Goodman's et al Parallax "Covid complaint" and the OTHER sham shells I detail below. In fact, take the SEC OWN WORDS in the Parallax complaint: Parallax ha

speak. This is why my claims have been criminally obstructed by the SEC. The SEC has REPEATEDLY bailed out a known criminal enterprise. This is why Goodman produced the bullshit "order handling" complaint almost 6 months after I sent him my TCR in July 2015. This is why ALL of the related entities are o

that violates the following laws and regulations: the Consumer Financial Protection Act 12 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq• New York Executive Law § 63(12); New York General Business Law ("GBL") § 349; New York Banking Law Article 12-D• New York Banking Law §§ 6-1 and 6-m• 3 CRR-NY 4§ 41.3(a) and 41.4(a); 3 CRR-NY § 420.18• New Yor

omic Substance Theory. WHY do sophisticated investors like the ones I have detailed extensively bother "investing" in these sham companies?? Take Mr Goodman's et al Parallax "Covid complaint" and the OTHER sham shells I detail below. In fact, take the SEC OWN WORDS in the Parallax complaint: Parallax ha

speak. This is why my claims have been criminally obstructed by the SEC. The SEC has REPEATEDLY bailed out a known criminal enterprise. This is why Goodman produced the bullshit "order handling" complaint almost 6 months after I sent him my TCR in July 2015. This is why ALL of the related entities are o

that violates the following laws and regulations: the Consumer Financial Protection Act 12 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq• New York Executive Law § 63(12); New York General Business Law ("GBL") § 349; New York Banking Law Article 12-D• New York Banking Law §§ 6-1 and 6-m; 3 CRR-NY 44 41.3(a) and 41.4(a); 3 CRR-NY § 420.18• New Yor

omic Substance Theory. WHY do sophisticated investors like the ones I have detailed extensively bother "investing" in these sham companies?? Take Mr Goodman's et al Parallax "Covid complaint" and the OTHER sham shells I detail below. In fact, take the SEC OWN WORDS in the Parallax complaint: Parallax ha

speak. This is why my claims have been criminally obstructed by the SEC. The SEC has REPEATEDLY bailed out a known criminal enterprise. This is why Goodman produced the bullshit "order handling" complaint almost 6 months after I sent him my TCR in July 2015. This is why ALL of the related entities are o

that violates the following laws and regulations: the Consumer Financial Protection Act 12 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq• New York Executive Law § 63(12); New York General Business Law ("GBL") § 349; New York Banking Law Article 12-D; New York Banking Law §§ 6-1 and 6-m• 3 CRR-NY 45 41.3(a) and 41.4(a); 3 CRR-NY § 420.18; New Yor

omic Substance Theory. WHY do sophisticated investors like the ones I have detailed extensively bother "investing" in these sham companies?? Take Mr Goodman's et al Parallax "Covid complaint" and the OTHER sham shells I detail below. In fact, take the SEC OWN WORDS in the Parallax complaint: Parallax ha

speak. This is why my claims have been criminally obstructed by the SEC. The SEC has REPEATEDLY bailed out a known criminal enterprise. This is why Goodman produced the bullshit "order handling" complaint almost 6 months after I sent him my TCR in July 2015. This is why ALL of the related entities are o

that violates the following laws and regulations: the Consumer Financial Protection Act 12 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq; New York Executive Law § 63(12); New York General Business Law ("GBL") § 349; New York Banking Law Article 12-D• New York Banking Law §§ 6-1 and 6-m; 3 CRR-NY §§ 41.3(a) and 41.4(a); 3 CRR-NY § 420.18• New Yor