Epstein Secrets

tional (continued) EFTA00156877 Table I. (continued) Study Purpose Design Sample Findings Summary Kogan (2004) Goodman-Brown. Edelstein. Goodman. Jones. and Gordon (2003) The purpose of this study was co identify factors chat influence the disclosures made by female survivors of USE in

elayed disclosures (Collin-Vezina, Sablonni, Palmer, & Milne, 2015; Crisma, Bascelli, Paci, & Romito, 2004; Easton, 2013; Goodman-Brown, Edelstein, Goodman, Jones, & Gordon, 2003; Hershkowitz, Lanes, & Lamb; 2007; Jonzon & Lindblad, 2004; McElvancy, 2015; Smith et al.. 2000). Incidence studies in the

oda- tion, delayed, conflicted, and unconvincing disclosures, and retraction or recantation, hold validity (for a review, see Lon- don, Bruck, Ceci, & Shuman, 2005). However, the idea of disclosure as a process has been carried over into contemporary thinking. Recently, McElvaney, Greene, and lIogan (20

e included in child maltreatment samples (but see Eisen, Goodman. Qin. Davis, & Crayton, 2007: Masten et al., 2008; Mefinder, Barr- gemd. (menstad, & Goodman, 2013), likely limiting the upper range of psychopathology symptoms studied. Finally, especially for longitudinal research, attrition can affect re

suffered the most severe maltreatment. resulting in permanent removal from home, may not be included in child maltreatment samples (but see Eisen, Goodman. Qin. Davis, & Crayton, 2007: Masten et al., 2008; Mefinder, Barr- gemd. (menstad, & Goodman, 2013), likely limiting the upper range of psychopatho

al assaults occurred. In light of widespread recognition that chil- dren infrequently disclose sexual abuse before adulthood (Lon- don, Bruck, Ceti, & Shuman. 2005). the statutes of limitation for sex crimes against children have been extended, paused, or abol- ished in many countries and US. jurisdictiom

elayed disclosures (Collin-VEzina, Sablonni, Palmer, & Milne, 2015; Crisma, Bascelli, Paci, & Romito, 2004; Easton, 2013; Goodman-Brown, Edelstein, Goodman, Jones, & Gordon, 2003; Hershkowitz, Lanes, & Lamb; 2007; Jonzon & Lindblad, 2004; McElvaney, 2015; Smith et al., 2000). Incidence studies in the

oda- tion, delayed, conflicted, and unconvincing disclosures, and retraction or recantation, hold validity (for a review, see Lon- don, Bruck, Ceci, & Shuman, 2005). However, the idea of disclosure as a process has been carried over into contemporary thinking. Recently, McElvaney, Greene, and Hogan (201