Epstein Secrets

. Discovery Day Care, Inc., case no. 09-64351 CA 30, Miami-Dade County Circuit Court; and Doe v. Waterford Kids Academy, Inc., case no. 09-CA-10377, Orange County Circuit Court; and Jane Doe No. 2 v. Archdiocese of Denver 4. Plaintiffs bring this Motion in good faith and not for purposes of undue delay. , c

_________/ PLAINTIFFS JANE DOES 2-7’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (JANE DOE 2, DE 539; JANE DOE 3, DE 141; JANE DOE 4, DE 157; JANE DOE 5, DE 139; JANE DOE 6, DE 91; JANE DOE 7, DE 107) Plaintiffs, Jane Does 2-7, by an

out limitation, a special set hearing and upcoming trial in John Doe 6 v. Diocese of Orlando, case no. 48-2005-010138-0, Ninth Judicial Circuit for Orange County, Florida; and an upcoming deadline to file Appellant’s initial Brief in Jane Doe v. Florida International University Board of Trustees, case no. 3D0

M.A., CASE NO.: 08- CV-80811 -MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al., Defendant. ____________________________________/

out limitation, a special set hearing and upcoming trial in John Doe 6 v. Diocese of Orlando, case no. 48-2005-010138-0, Ninth Judicial Circuit for Orange County, Florida; and an upcoming deadline to file Appellant's initial Brief in Jane Doe v. Florida International University Board of Trustees case no. 3D09

OHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08- CV-80811 -MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al., Defendant. DOE II, CASE NO.: 08-CV- 80469-MARRA/JOHNSON Plainti

ttee for Skeptical Inquiry — C.S.I.) Sexual Sanity Award, Sexual Intelligence, 2001 OC Metro magazine selection as one of the "Hottest 25 People in Orange County for 2002" 3 EFTA00073072 Listed in One Hundred Most Eminent Psychologists of the 20th century. #58. Review of General Psychology, 2002. Univers

Balancing with the players stacked against you. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 365-366 (Book Review). Loftus, E.F. & Guyer, M. (2002) Who Abused Jane Doe?: The Hazards of the Single Case History. Skeptical Inquirer. Part I. Vol 26, #3 (May/June), Pp. 24-32. Loftus, E. F. & Guyer, M. J. (2002) Who Abu

m there. NO. Your case will initially be assigned to the Western Division. Enter "Western" in response to Question E, below, and continue from there. Orange County Riverside or San Bemardino County Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara, or San Luis Obispo County QUESTION C: Is the United States, or C. 1. Do 50% or

y 23 massage while he was completely naked. The Defendant, Donald J. Trump, was also present as he 24 was getting his own massage from another minor, Jane Doe, age 13. Defendant Epstein forced 25 Plaintiff Johnson to touch his erect penis by physically placing her bare hands upon his sex organ 26 and again