Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
sidered limitations of the law it is charged with enforcing"); United States v. Anderson, 772 F.3d 969, 976 (2d Cir. 2014) (same); United States v. Jennings, 960 F.2d 1488, 1491 (9th Cir. 1992) ("Absent a violation of a recognized right under the Constitution, a statute, or a procedural rule, a district
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00100116 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
sidered limitations of the law it is charged with enforcing"); United States v. Anderson, 772 F.3d 969, 976 (2d Cir. 2014) (same); United States v. Jennings, 960 F.2d 1488, 1491 (9th Cir. 1992) ("Absent a violation of a recognized right under the Constitution, a statute, or a procedural rule, a district
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00077781 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
sidered limitations of the law it is charged with enforcing"); United States v. Anderson, 772 F.3d 969, 976 (2d Cir. 2014) (same); United States v. Jennings, 960 F.2d 1488, 1491 (9th Cir. 1992) ("Absent a violation of a recognized right under the Constitution, a statute, or a procedural rule, a district
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00039596 VII.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
sidered limitations of the law it is charged with enforcing"); United States v. Anderson, 772 F.3d 969, 976 (2d Cir. 2014) (same); United States v. Jennings, 960 F.2d 1488, 1491 (9th Cir. 1992) ("Absent a violation of a recognized right under the Constitution, a statute, or a procedural rule, a district
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00103174 VII.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Jennings and N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON28 w/ Jennings·4 w/ N.Y.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON20 w/ Jennings·4 w/ N.Y.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON19 w/ Jennings·4 w/ N.Y.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON18 w/ Jennings·4 w/ N.Y.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON18 w/ Jennings·3 w/ N.Y.
the Southern District
LOCATION15 w/ Jennings·4 w/ N.Y.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON15 w/ Jennings·4 w/ N.Y.
David Boies
PERSON14 w/ Jennings·4 w/ N.Y.
Chris Tucker
PERSON14 w/ Jennings·4 w/ N.Y.
United States
LOCATION14 w/ Jennings·4 w/ N.Y.
Stephen Hawking
PERSON13 w/ Jennings·4 w/ N.Y.
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON12 w/ Jennings·4 w/ N.Y.
Michael Jackson
PERSON12 w/ Jennings·4 w/ N.Y.
Colorado
LOCATION12 w/ Jennings·4 w/ N.Y.
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON13 w/ Jennings·2 w/ N.Y.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Jennings·4 w/ N.Y.
North Carolina
LOCATION11 w/ Jennings·4 w/ N.Y.
MY
Myers
PERSON11 w/ Jennings·4 w/ N.Y.
Eric Schmidt
PERSON11 w/ Jennings·4 w/ N.Y.
WA
Walsh
PERSON11 w/ Jennings·4 w/ N.Y.