r claims against these financial sponsors of terrorism. Statement Of Subject Matter and Appellate Jurisdiction The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York had subject matter jurisdiction over these actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1330, 1331, 1332, 1350, 1367, 1407, and 1605, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1964 and 2338,

rorist activities and to be affiliated with al-Qaeda. See Wyatt, 785 F. Supp. 2d at 647-48; see also Goldberg v. UBS AG, 660 F. Supp. 2d 410, 428-29 (E.D.N.Y. 2009) (finding that plaintiffs had “sufficiently pled that the defendant consciously disregarded the fact that it was supporting a terrorist organiza

eclare as follows: 1. Iam an attorney at law duly licensed in the State of New York and admitted to practice in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Iam a member of the law firm Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C., counsel of record for Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in this action. I respectfully submit

rs, the same standard governs the addition of parties under Rule 21 and Rule 15. See Goston v. Potter, No. 08-cv-478 FJS ATB, 2010 WL 4774238, at *5 (N.D.N.Y. 2010) (citing Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Universal Music Grp., Inc., 248 F.R.D. 408, 412 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)). 4 GIUFFRE002847 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014680

//wwwjustice. gov/ criminal/fraud/ fcpa/ cases/sapsizianc/' 06-06-07 sapsizian- plea.pdf. ? See, 6.8, Complaint, SEC y. Tyco Int'l Ltd., 06-cv-2942 (S.D.N-Y. 2006), ECF No. 1 [hereinafter SEC v. Tyco Int'l], available at http://www.sec. gov/litigation/complaints/2006/comp 1 9657.pdf; Complaint, SEC v. Will

ce.gov/criminal/ fraud/fcpa/cases/saybolt/08- 10-98saybolt-info.pdf. 277 See Second Superseding Indictment, United States v. Kozeny, No. 05- cr-518 (S.D.NY. May 26, 2009), ECF No. 203, available at http://www. justice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa/cases/kozenyv/05-26-09bourke2nd- supersed-indict.pdf; Judgment,

eclare as follows: 1. Iam an attorney at law duly licensed in the State of New York and admitted to practice in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Iam a member of the law firm Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C., counsel of record for Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in this action. I respectfully submit

fre’s factual assertions as “entirely false” and “entirely untrue.” 32. Maxwell made the same false and defamatory statements as set forth above, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere in a deliberate effort to maliciously discredit Giuffre and silence her efforts to expose sex crimes committed around the world by Maxw

onvincing Congress to expand their discretion at the expense of judges' sentencing authority, see United States v. Kupa, 976 F. Supp. 2d 417, 419-27 (E.D.N.Y. 2013) (describing the legislative history and Justice Department lobbying related to federal drug statutes, notably 27 U.S.C. § 841 (2012)). 218 See

ights even before prosecutors filed a superseding indictment covering the specific crimes affecting the victims. Citing Dean, the District Court for the Eastern District of New York agreed that the rights ® John W. Gillis & Douglas E. Beloof, The Next Step for a Maturing Victim Rights Movement: Enforcing Crime Victim Rights in t

(9th Cir. 2006); United States v. Degenhardt, 405 F. Supp. 1341, 1343-44 (D. Utah 2005); see also United States v. Turner, 367 F. Supp. 2d 319, 333 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (reaching same conclusion). *98 Bucklew Memo, supra note 580, app. a, at 299, 302-03. DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017711 --- PAGE BREAK --

rious crimes the right to restitution. *°* Reinforcing those laws, the CVRA guarantees that victims have "the right 43 Magistrate Judge Orenstein of the Eastern District of New York, who has written many thoughtful opinions on the CVRA, has taken a contrary position. See Report and Recommendation, United States v. Ingrassis, No.

th, veracity or substantiation,” Menninger noted in a 2016 response filed in the case. In February, the Miami Herald filed a federal court motion in the Southern District of New York, seeking access to documents that were sealed in the Maxwell case. The motion, which was not opposed by Roberts, could have cast light on the full sc

ccusations made against him,” Freeh wrote. Most of the court records in the Roberts case are sealed. In February, the Miami Herald filed a motion in the Southern District of New York, seeking access to documents. The motion, which was not opposed by Roberts, could shed more light on the full scope of Epstein’s crimes and who was

ims. 89. Dershowitz, personally, intentionally, and maliciously made false and damaging statements of fact concerning Roberts, as detailed above, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere. 90. The false statements that Dershowitz made, personally on behalf of himself and Epstein not only called Roberts’s truthfulness and

ional. by Jesse Eisinger ProPublica, March 12, 2017, 6:22 p.m. 1 Comment Print Print search Follow ProPublica reet Bharara, then U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, at Trump Tower in November 2016 (Drew Angerer/Getty Images) After his election in 1968, President Richard Nixon asked Robert Morgenthau, the US Att

fficking of underage girls. The case — which was settled in 2017 — involved Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who sued Ghislaine Maxwell in federal court in the Southern District of New York in 2015. Giuffre has asserted that Maxwell and Epstein trafficked her and other underage girls, often at sex parties that Epstein hosted at his homes

fficials, as | do, the potential for conflicts is significantly less. LD: What agency is most likely to strike fear in the heart of defendants? RW: The Southern District of New York is the elite prosecutor’s office in the country. | don’t think you’d get much dispute there. They’re aggressive, they’re smart, they have this enormo

General Don Verrilli; Labor Secretary Tom Perez; Loretta Lynch, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York; Preet Bharara, U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York; Jenny Durkan, who resigned as U.S. attorney in Washington state last month; former Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano; Tony West, who rece

.com Page 2 of 3 The rape suit isn't exactly new. It was filed pro se by "Katie Johnson" in Los Angeles federal court in April, dismissed, refiled in the Southern District of New York, withdrawn and refiled on Sept. 30. But with the addition of Mason—a media-savvy lawyer not known for shying away from the spotlight-the stakes have

ld not "be extorted or hide information" relevant to that probe. The case is U.S. v. Avenatti, case number 19-mj-2927, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031778

uthern District of New York, at the United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, Room 220, in the Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, New York, in the Southern District of New York, at the following date, time and place: Appearance Date: July 24, 2019 Appearance Time: 10:00 a.m. to testify and give evidence in regard to an a

le 403. Whether or not Ms. Giuffre ever used drugs while not being abused by defendant does not go to any claim or defenses in this case. Courts in the Southern District of New York routinely xclud vidence of prior drug use under both of these rules, as fully briefed in the papers. Defendant attempts to admit this evidence of pr