1
Total Mentions
1
Documents
0
Connected Entities
Name reference in documents
EFTA00227381_email_007_sub_002 - EFTA00227381_1065
ad earlier affirmed the use of dog sniffs in vehicle chec ints (although ruling unconstitutional other aspects of the checkpoints) in Indianapolis I. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32, 40 (2000). (Lower courts have spelled out one additional requirement for this test, which is implicit in the Supreme Court precedents
No connected entities