deciding issue of whether work product protection was waived, under Maryland law). CNA cotitePtig that under Fp urth Cir- • such as the email froms&yeragesci CLEM _ counsel and Hoefer's chatacterizatimilt 1 anal sis, is afforded immune" or "nearly a' so utely 4mmune frel11-61164" *uamel- ert zwal°—anI