
1
Total Mentions
1
Documents
0
Connected Entities
Name reference in documents
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024631_sub_001 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024730
ical marijuana activity because, in the DOJ’s view, the amendment did not apply to prosecutions against individuals. The DOJ’s interpretation of the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment was rejected by a Ninth Circuit District Court in its 2015 ruling in United States v. Marin Alliance for Medical Marijuana, and again by th
No connected entities