s induced to cooperate, but that there is no Limit to what the defendant can demand in return for his cooperation. See Quota- main, 613 F.28 at 45 (Aldisert, 3., dissent- ing) ("(71The United States Attorney is at liberty to impose conditions that usually relate to testifying or providing certain in- fo

actional" immu- nity has been used by this court to describe an agreement not to prosecute. See Rowe, 676 F.2d at 526; Quatermain, 613 F.2d at 44 (Aldisert, J., dissenting) (although the district court phrased its discussion in terms of transactional and use immunity, analyzing it as an agreement not