tiff, v. John ROURKE, et al., Defendants. Crim. No. 84-94-N. June 21, 1985. On defendant's motion for bail pending ap- peal, the District Court, Doumar, J., held that: (1) defendant was not entitled to bail pending appeal; (2) Bail Reform Act of 1984 is not an ex post facto law; and (3) no manife