1721, 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982). S.Rep. No. 225, 98th Cong. at 1st Sees. at 22 (1983), reprinted in 1984 U.S. Code Cong. & Adm.News at 25 (Supp. 9A). Delker, 757 F.2d at 1396. In Edwards, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals held that "the information presented to the judi- cial officer by either t

the government's case agent who was present at the detention hearing. The district court, citing a decision of the Third Circuit, United States v. Delker, 757 F.2d 1390 (3d Cir.I985), stated that "the magistrate did not err in allowing the government to proceed by proffer during the pretrial detent