her Congress has "expressly prescribed the statute's proper reach." Landgraf, 511 U.S. at 280. When evaluating Congress's intent at step one of the Landgrafinquiry, the Second Circuit has considered both the text of the statute and the legislative history. Enterprise, 391 F.3d at 406-08. In this case, the amend

all past offenders. According to the 14 Moreover, the fad that Congress considered, but ultimately omitted, retroactivity language does not end the Landgrafinquiry, as the defendant suggests. Indeed, Landgrafitself makes this clear. In that case, the statute at issue had a predecessor, which contained a retroac