cal words used in different parts of the same act are intended to have the same meaning." Scalia & Garner, Reading Law § 25, at 170 (quoting ? AN. Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United States, 286 U.S. 427, 433, 52 S.Ct. 607, 76 L.Ed. 1204 (1932)). The dissents have no explanation for their incongruous reading of the wh