idence." (citing United States v. Mathis, 264 F.3d 321, 336 (3d Cir. 2001))). Courts, however, must exercise "judicial oversight" in this area. See Shohola, 2019 WL 6053223, at *10-13. "Left unregulated, memory expert testimony can invade the fundamental province of the jury—determining witness credibi

ng cases)); Shiraishi, 2019 WL 1386365, at *3 (discussing the need for the expert testimony to "fit" the evidence or facts of the particular case); Shohola, 2019 WL 6053223, at *10-13 ("First, courts have recognized that expert testimony concerning the vagaries of human recollection that is stated with