level has three (3) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms and the lower level is split into two (2) separate one (1) bedroom, one (1) bathroom units. Dr. Wright-Francis continues to occupy the main level of the marital homestead while Mr. Francis has remained in the one (1) bedroom unit which he previously used as

rsity located in Washington. D.C. The Court also heard sworn expert testimony from Erika Kellerhals, Esq., (hereafter Kellerhals) on behalf of Dr. Wright-Francis. Kellerhals testified that she analyzed Mr. Francis' financial records. She advised the Court that she submitted her findings in two (2) reports: t

ey for work it has done on the homestead:a 19 See Civil Complaint. Babe v. Jule° Francis 8 Debra Francis. ST-14-CV-188 Testimony revealed that Dr. Wright-Francis assumed responsibility for the children's school tuition and cost of other activities during the course of their marriage. Mr. Francis satisfied al

food, clothing, shelter, transportation, and medical care." 21 See. Paragraph (2) (b) of Order dated December 23. 2011 22 id. at Paragraph 5. Dr. Wright-Francis argues that Mr. Francis excessively spent and wasted assets. Dr. Wright-Francis submitted reports and sworn testimony analyzing Mr. Francis' income

nd their children, as they are both accomplished professionals and have already agreed to share equally in the costs of raising their children. Dr. Wright-Francis obviously has the capacity and means to secure alternative housing; and has neither demonstrated a need [-21] or desire to remain in the marital ho