ributable to BRH. 4. =he IRS seems to be pointing out 2 different problems in its respective let=ers: (a) How does BRH income/loss/expense flow to LDB'= return, and (b) The original BRH numbers were wrong, and have been changed by the IRS. In other words, the first letter i=plicitly asks us to trace

te which mentions=BRH. 3. I'm not sure how the IRS traces this number to the LDB r=turn, as the BRH K-1 was issued to BFP, and was not attached to LDB'= return. LDB's 2012 return references a few items from BRH "via Black Family Partners," so maybe the IRS assumes that LDB=pays taxes attributable to