A_R1_01892289 EFTA02651107 2. The second IRS letter almost suggests the opposite. It is in ef=ect saying that the original K-1 is wrong. P. 9 of the pdf ind=cates an adjustment of $884,006, referencing 98-054199, which is BRH's TIN; not to mention the p. 10 footnote which mentio=s BRH. 3. I'm not sure h