ment of an unjust enrichment claim). CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. In the Matter of: MPM Silicones, L.L.C. MOMENTIVE PERFORMANCE MATERIALS INCORPORATED, APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, AD HOC COMMITTEE OF SECOND LIEN HOLDERS, Plaintiffs-Appellees

er the cramdown provision of Chapter 11. We decline to dismiss these appeals as equitably moot. U.S. Bank N.A. v. Wilmington Say. Fund Soc'y (In re MPM Silicones, LLC), 531 B.R. 321, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66420 (S.D.N.Y., May 4, 2015) CASE SUMMARY: OVERVIEW: HOLDINGS: [1]-A Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan that w

L. Rep. (CCH) P83,176; 64 Bankr. Ct. Dec. 216 Despite these objections, the bankruptcy court confirmed the Plan following a four-day hearing. In re MPM Silicones, LLC, 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 3926, 2014 WL 4436335 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Sept. 9, 2014), aff'd, 531 B.R. 321 (S.D.N.Y. 2015). Confirmation was facilitated by

are as follows: 2 The facts recounted herein derive principally from the bankruptcy courts decision confirming Debtors' reorganization plan, In re MPM Silicones. LLC. 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 3926. 2014 WL 4436335 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Seq. 9, 2014). affd 531 B.R. 321 (S.0.N.Y. 2015). as well as the public disclosures m

CCH) P83,176; 64 Bankr. Ct. Dec. 216 lenders to provide that financing. Those lenders quoted MPM rates of interest ranging between 5 and See In re MPM Silicones, LLC, 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 3926, 2014 WL 4436335, at *29. At these rates, the First-Lien Note holders contend that they would have received around r2