<mailto > wrote: 2 EFTA_R1_01799328 EFTA02607443 HI.. I =m thinking of sending a letter along these lines (to be further edited of =ourse) to Carla Mehnke, asking her to reopen her investigation into the sk=ptics allegation on the basis of new evidence. I don't see a=down side, even if she doesn't chan

at 1:35 PM, =awrence Krauss cmailtc target=> wrote: HI.. I am thinking of sending a letter along these lines (to be =urther edited of course) to Carla Mehnke, asking her to reopen her investi=ation into the skeptics allegation on the basis of new evidence. I d=n't see a down side, even if she doesn't chan

6, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Lawrence Krauss <mailto > wrote: HI.. I am thinking of sending a letter along these lines (to =e further edited of course) to Carla Mehnke, asking her to reopen her =nvestigation into the skeptics allegation on the basis of new =vidence. I don't see a down side, even if she doesn'= chan

div> On Sun, Aug=26, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Lawrence Krauss HI.. I am thinking of sending a letter alo=g these lines (to be further edited of course) to Carla Mehnke, asking her=to reopen her investigation into the skeptics allegation on the basis of n=w evidence. I don't see a down side, even if she doesn4k=99t

M, Lawrence Krauss =span dir="ltr" class=""fl =rote: HI.. I am thinking of sending a letter along these lines (to =e further edited of course) to Carla Mehnke, asking her to reopen her =nvestigation into the skeptics allegation on the basis of new =vidence. I don't see a down side, even if she doesn'= chan