1
Total Mentions
1
Documents
0
Connected Entities
Name reference in documents
EFTA01295413_sub_001 - EFTA01295413_100
ble to rely and actual reliance on the promise to the detriment of one who relied. Cox v. True N. Energy, 524 F. Supp. 2d 927, 946 (N.D. Ohio 2007); Patrick v. Painesville Commer. Props., 123 Ohio App. 3d 575, 583, 704 N.E.2d 1249 (Ohio Ct. App. 1997). However, "Ohio law bars a promissory estoppel claim when
No connected entities