2
Total Mentions
1
Documents
0
Connected Entities
Name reference in documents
EFTA01295633_sub_001 - EFTA01295633_100
did not require (Defendant] to place r30] the cheapest insurance available. it was not entitled to use its discretion to obtain secret kickbacks(.1 Laffan, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79915, 2014 WL 2693158 at *5. 12 Bartell° is also not as factually similar to the instant matter as Statebridge suggests. Des
acterization of Plaintiff's bargain is incomplete.0 In denying a motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim for breach of an implied covenant, the Court in Laffan v. Santander Bank N.A., No. CIV.A. 13-4040, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79915, 2014 WL 2693158 (E.D. Pa. June 12, 2014)) observed the following: The pur
No connected entities