and avoiding duplicative discovery are laudable goals . . . they hardly amount to extraordinary circumstances or compelling need." Md. Cas. Co. v. W.R. Grace & Co., No. 83 Civ. 7451 (SWK), 1994 WL 419787, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 10, 1994). Moreover, the Court is not convinced that the production of the Maxwell m

once made," Amgen, Inc., 133 S. Ct. at 1202 n.9, and a district court has "considerable discretion to decertify the class," Cent. Wesleyan Coll. v. W.R. Grace & Co., 6 F.3d 177, 189 (4th Cir. 1993). See also PradoSteiman ex rel. Prado v. Bush, 221 F.3d 1266, 1273 (11th Cir. 2000). The district court could revisi