agreement sets forth the parties' intent clearly and unambig- uously? Sterling Drug Inc. Bayer AG, 792 F.Supp. 1357, 1365 (S.D.NN.1992). See also Chimart Associates I Paul, 66 N.Y.2d 570, 498 N.Y.S2d 344, 34, 489 N.E.2d 231, 233 (Ct.App.1986) (Where a contract is un- ambiguous on its face, the Court may not co