t she was acting for Ms Pearce under section 269W of the CLCA. ,f4 els4—. T Rv:C ) • )L i-iC-1 I nen k J. 40. The practitioner appeared before Mr Grasso SM. His Honour and the practitioner were both in Port Adelaide. There was an audio visual link (AVL) to Pt Pirie where Ms Pearce was present. 41. Ms

re can be no doubt the practitioner genuinely held her belief. There is objective evidence to support the belief she held. The practitioner advised Mr Grasso SM when she appeared on 11 March 2016 that she was acting pursuant to s269W of the CLCA. It is clear his Honour was satisfied that it was app onriate