he trial court, while noting that "everybody understands who is being released and who isn't", concluded that he was constrained by our decision in Papouras v. Bellsouth Telecommunications., Inc. 940 So.2d 479 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), and denied Jones' motion because the release was neither summarized nor

denied Jones' motion because the release was neither summarized nor attached to the proposal for settlement. Our review of this denial is de novo. Papouras, 940 So.2d at 480. In those cases where the release provisions contained within a proposal for settlement were deemed to be ambiguous, either ther