imed she didn't have access to any of the documents she'd need to vote. With no driver's license and no birth certificate, needed to get a photo ID, Applewhite said she'd be disenfranchised by the law. And she wasn't the only one. A number of other plantiffs in the ACLU case against Pennsylvania's photo I

68 (11th Cir. 2004), abrogated on other grounds by Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co., 553 U.S. 639, 128 S. Ct. 2131, 170 L. Ed. 2d 1012 (2008); Applewhite v. Reichhold Chems., Inc., 67 F.3d 571, 573-74 (5th Cir. 1995). Nothing calls for a different result here. B. For internal use only SDNY_GM_0005