o error rates, no studies, and authors simply say these are "potential pathways to false allegations" — hypothesizing. They say rates are very low. o LR doesn't know the journal, but we could look up the impact factor • Something can be generally accepted, peer reviewed, etc. without having a known

emory. Foundational principles, some derived from Loftus, well accepted in literature o Not an expert on memory o Key principles are in agreement o LR has gone to a training by Loftus • Very difficult to distinguish grooming/non-grooming ex ante -> models require conscious intention, but context