ft v. !Oat 556 U.S. , 129 S. Ct. 1937 (2009), Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside, 578 F.3d 203, 210- 211 (3r° Cir. 2009) (quoting %bal. 129 S.O. at 1949-50), Sheridan v. NGK Metals Corp., 609 F. 3d 239, 262 n. 27 (3d Cir. 2010) and Monroe v. Beard, 536 F.3d 198, 205 (3d Cir. 2008). I. PLAINTIFFS PROPERLY SERVED DEFENDANT WITH THE