1
Total Mentions
1
Documents
0
Connected Entities
Name reference in documents
EFTA00309181
ccept service and that Barthod was not authorized by law to accept service, which Mr. Barthod clearly did not do, this would not negate service. See Shedlin v. State Tax Commission, 62 A.D.2d 806, 808-809 (st Y.A.D. 1978) (service on a secretary who protested that she could not 4 A true and correct copy
No connected entities