tico (01/17, Wehle) reported that the Supreme Court's decision to hear Joseph W. Fischer v. United States, a case questioning the use of a 2002 law (Sarbanes-Oxley Act) in prosecuting Jan. 6 defendants, could significantly impact Special Counsel Jack Smith's prosecution of Donald Trump. The article explained that t

h obstruction charges they face related to the January 6 riot. According to the article, they are contesting the application of a provision from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, originally designed for corporate malfeasance, against Capitol rioters who disrupted congressional proceedings. Critics argue that using t

D (or 583). January 02/07/08 Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have filed the certifications required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 with the Securities and Exchange Commission as exhibits to our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3. 2007. In addition. our Chief

but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements

ended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accountant standards used. Compliance obligations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may make it more difficult for us to effectuate our business combination, require substantial financial and management resources, and increase the t

-Oxley Act regarding adequacy of their internal controls. The development of the internal controls of any such entity to achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increase the time and costs necessary• to complete any such acquisition. Prior to the date of this prospectus, we will file a Registration Stat

tion of this offering, we will be subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended (the 'Sarbanes-Oxley Act"), the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and the rules and regulations

reporting requirements and costs of recruiting and retaining non-executive directors. We also have incurred and will incur costs associated with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and related rules implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, and NASDAQ. The expenses incurred by public companies generally

ed financial statements may not contain all footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles. The Company has fully complied with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; however auditor attestation of the Company's compliance is not currently required. 5.16 Stabilization. Neither the Company nor any of its

Especially risky tranches of RMBS kept by Bear Stearns as a result of the securitization process. RSU: Restricted Stock Units. Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Schwartz: Defendant Alan D. Schwartz, Co-President and Co-Chief Operating Officer of Bear Stearns. He became sole President on August 5, 2

ly all material weaknesses in the Company's internal controls. 356. Beginning in 2002, the Officer Defendants were required under Rule 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to provide assurances relating to the Company's "internal control over financial reporting." Rule 302 states as follows: [E]ach annual report ... [