1222 755 FEDERAL REPORTER, 2d SERIES lations outweighs the chill placed upon HH & M's exercise of its first amendment rights. C. We agree with the Fourth Circuit's con- clusion that the disclosures required by sec- tion 203(b) of the Act are "unquestionably 'substantially related' " to the govern- ment's compel

ict [**60] court's finding that there is no pattern-or-practice evidence in the non-Beam Mill departments is directly contrary to the evidence and [the Fourth Circuit's] mandate." Appellants' Br. 42-43. It is true that the workers arguments often focus expressly on the question of commonality, as Wal-Mart focused