rdinary remedy which should be granted sparingly and only after the moving party has alleged and proven facts entitling it to relief. See Shands at Lake Shore, Inc. v. Ferrero, 898 So. 2d 1037, 1038 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Wade v. Brown, 928 So. 2d 1260, 1262 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). As a threshold matter, the C

efendant's ac- tivities in are such that in person- am jurisdiction may be exercised without violating due process. See, e.g., Federal Ins. Co. v. Lake Shore, Inc., 886 F2d 654, 657 n. 2 (4th Cir.1989); Superfos !nos. Ltd v. FirstMiss, 774 F.Supp. 393, 397 (E.D.Va.1991). 110-121 The due process clause