ng the second deposition in June. The relief is opposed by the Morse Defendants because: 1) the Razorback Victims already asked questions about the Morses during Rothstein's first deposition; 2) the underlying claims against the Morse Defendants in state court may be dismissed; and 3) granting this re

end that although they did ask Rothstein various questions about the Morse Defendants at the December deposition, they did so over objection of the Morses' counsel, and fear that this deposition testimony may not be admissible in their state court action. They contend that Rothstein is the only witness

s a group of investors, told the judge that based on bankruptcy records, Rothstein stole about $168 million during the five-year Ponzi scheme. The Morses' suit alleges five of Rothstein's former law partners mishandled four separate civil cases on their behalf. Kusnick's attorney, Kelman, asked Browa