related documents may not be admissible at trial is not a basis to deny their production in discovery.2 In Cupac. Inc.'. Mid-West Agency. Inc. 100 F.R.D. 440 (S.D. Ohio 1983), the Court held on these grounds that a party could obtain discovery relating to a criminal plea, including the answers to question

t *2 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 2015) (citing Baki v. B.F. Diamond Constr. Co., 71 F.R.D. 179, 181-82 (D.Md. 1976)); Eisai Co. v. Teva Phann. USA, Inc., 247 F.R.D. 440, 441-42 (D.N.J. 2007). Ms. Maxwell has not sought discovery of "facts known or opinions held" by any non-testifying expert.t t It is Plaintiff's bu