y interest in not being subject to the binding judgments of a forum with which he has established N] no meaningful 'contacts, ties, or relations."' Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 471-72, 105 S. Ct. 2174, 85 L. Ed. 2d 528 (1985) (quoting International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 319, 66 S

iction is proper when parties "reach out beyond one state and create continuing relationships and obligations with the citizens of another state." Burger King Corp. I. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 256 (1985). In cases where a out-of-state resident contracts with a forum resident, whether the out-of-state resident

o the burdens of litigation in that forum as well." Urgent v. Technical Assistance Bureau, Inc., 255 F.Supp.2d 532, 536 - 37 (D.V.I. 2003) (quoting Burger King Corp., 471 U.S. at 475 — 476, 105 S.Ct. 2174 (1985) (citations and quotations omitted)). As explained above, long arm jurisdiction applies because the ca