in the complaint and submissions in opposition to the motion as true and accord the plaintiff "the benefit of every possible favorable inference" (Sokoloff v Harriman Estates Dev. Corp., 96 NY2d 409. 414 [2001]; see also Thomas v LaSalle Bank N.A., 79 [*10]AD3d 1015, 1017 [2d Dept 2010]). The court, in accepting the facts alleged i