From: ==la> To: "Jay Lefkowitz" •t: > Subject: Re: 3:00 good for JE Call? Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:34:06 +0000 ok, thanks On Aug 11, 2011, at 2:33 PM, Jay Lefkowitz wrote: > At 3 I will be at Original Message >

From: To: "Jay Lefkowitz" •t: > Subject: Re: 3:00 good for JE Call? Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:23:26 +0000 fyi...I believe Darren will call you first then he will conf. in Jeffrey...Marty is not available, but Jeff

From: ==. > To: Jay Lefkowitz Subject: 3:00 good for JE Call? Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:09:11 +0000 Does 3:00 still work for you? What number can JE reach you on? EFTA00429428

From: ==la> To: "Jay Lefkowitz" •t: > Subject: Re: 3:00 good for JE Call? Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:12:05 +0000 perfect! thank you so much On Aug 11, 2011, at 2:11 PM, Jay Lefkowitz wrote: > Sure. That's 50 min from no

From: To: "Jay Lefkowitz" •t: > Subject: Re: 3:00 good for JE Call? Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:01:17 +0000 Jay, Darren is calling the below number and it just rings and rings...are you sure it is correct? On Aug 1

From: "Jay Lefkowitz" To:' Subject: Re: 3:00 good for JE Call? Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:33:01 +0000 Importance: Normal At 3 I will be at Original Message From: Sent: 08/11/2011 02:23 PM AST To: Jay Lefko

From: "Jay Lefkowitz" To:' Subject: Re: 3:00 good for JE Call? Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:11:14 +0000 Importance: Normal Sure. That's 50 min from now. I will be at a hard line by then and will email you the n