reements here could only reasonably be read unambiguously in its favor is essentially one for summary judgment on Jeepers's written contract claim. Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chems. Co. v. Am. Motorists Ins. Co., 616 A.2d 1192, 1196 (Del. 1992) ("The proper construction of any contract . . . is purely a question of law."). A contra