shes that this Court erred. Nor does his "supplemental authority." Instead of accepting the Court's ruling, Edwards invites this Court to hold that the Third District Court of Appeal committed error in Wolfe. The Florida Supreme Court, however, stated unequivocally that a "trial court may not overrule or recede from th

shes that this Court erred. Nor does his "supplemental authority." Instead of accepting the Court's ruling, Edwards invites this Court to hold that the Third District Court of Appeal committed error in Wolfe. The Florida Supreme Court, however, stated unequivocally that a "trial court may not overrule or recede from th

ainst Epstein were all acts that occurred during the course of the judicial proceeding and therefore bore some relation to the proceeding. In Wolfe, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's order granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings in an EFTA00582875 abuse of process and malicious pros