ment may be affirmed pursuant to tipsy coachman doctrine because the trial court `reache[d] the right result, but for the wrong reasons.") (quoting Advanced Chiropractic & Rehab. Ctr. Corp. v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 103 So. 3d 866, 869 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)); see also Shands Teaching Hosp. and Clinics, Inc. v. Mercury Ins. Co