Claim to Orig. U.S. (ion. Works. Footnotes Durkin v. Davis, 814 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2d Dist. 2002); Hardick v. Homo!, 795 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 5th Dist. 2001); Beizer v. Judge, 743 So. 2d 134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 4th Dist. 1999); McCraney v. Barbed, 677 So. 2d 355 (Fla. Dist. Ct.

hat criminal objects are located in a particular place to which they have not been tied by direct evidence." State v. Powers 388 So. 2d 1050, 1051 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980) (emphasis added) (citations omitted) Edwards further claims that the facts cited by Epstein are immaterial, and posits a series of

D OPINION PRIOR HISTORY: Mi Lower Tribunal No(s).: 4D14-2282; 502009CA040800XXXXMB. Edwards v. Epstein, 178 So. 3d 942, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16981 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 4th Dist., Nov. 12, 2015) JUDGES: LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur. OPINION Upon review of the res