nder domestic tort law." Amerada Hess, 488 U.S. at 439-40, 109 S.M. 683; Burnett II, 292 F.Supp2d at 19 (stating "the legislative history [of the FSIAJ counsels that the exception should be narrowly construed so as not to encompass the farthest reaches of common law"). Plaintiffs respond that if