Sackett litigation involves Michael and Chantell Sackett, who have been unable to build a house because the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers determined that a wetland on their Idaho property was a WOTUS. The article stated that according to the justices, a wetland is broadly

vious owner submitted an application for the existing dock which was approved by DPNR's Division of Coastal Zone Management. but was not approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers due to objections by National Marine Fisheries because of the shallowness of the bay. The dock was constructed by the previous owner d